
A powerful federal appeals court has cleared the way for the Biden ghostwriter tapes to be released, smashing his last-ditch bid to keep 70 hours of interview recordings hidden from the American people.
Story Snapshot
- Federal judges ruled that public interest in Biden’s interview tapes outweighs his privacy claims.
- The Justice Department can now release redacted transcripts and audio to the Heritage Foundation.
- Biden fought disclosure for months, then backed down and dropped his lawsuit after losing on appeal.
- The recordings were used in a classified documents probe and may show how Biden handled sensitive material.
Court Says Public’s Right to Know Beats Biden’s Privacy Claims
A three-judge panel on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled 2–1 that there is a “significant” public interest in the release of Biden’s 2016–2017 interviews with his ghostwriter for his memoir “Promise Me, Dad.” The judges said redactions already made by the Justice Department can protect any remaining personal details, so what is left should be released. The panel held that whatever privacy concerns remain do not outweigh the strong public interest.
The case began when the Heritage Foundation sought the recordings and transcripts under the Freedom of Information Act, arguing that the public deserves to see how Biden spoke about his life and his handling of classified documents. The Justice Department agreed the materials exist and treated them as government records, putting them under federal transparency laws. That meant Biden could not simply claim they were private book notes. Instead, he had to convince courts that his personal privacy should override normal rules of disclosure, and he failed.
Heritage Foundation Wins After Months of Legal Stonewalling
A federal district judge, Dabney Friedrich, first rejected Biden’s request for a preliminary injunction, holding that the Justice Department may release redacted versions of the tapes and transcripts to the Heritage Foundation. Her ruling found the public’s interest in the records outweighs Biden’s effort to keep them secret, especially because they were central to a special counsel investigation into his handling of classified material. To give Biden a chance to appeal, she temporarily paused the release for three weeks, but she did not change her bottom-line judgment.
Biden then went to the appeals court seeking an emergency injunction to stop the release, again arguing privacy and claiming the interviews were deeply personal. The appeals court briefly issued a short-term administrative stay so it could study his request. After review, the panel denied Biden’s motion in a 2–1 decision, siding with transparency and allowing the Justice Department’s release plan to move forward. The lone dissenting judge would have granted the injunction, but the majority held firm for public access.
Biden Finally Drops His Fight as Release Nears
After losing in the appeals court, Biden still had one option left: he could ask the full appeals court or the Supreme Court to step in. That path was a long shot, and it would have kept the tapes locked up even longer while legal maneuvering continued. Instead, Biden’s lawyers filed a notice of voluntary dismissal in his separate lawsuit against the Justice Department, effectively ending his court battle over the recordings. By backing off, Biden removed the last major legal obstacle to the release.
Joe Biden gives up, declines to seek further review of court ruling on release of audiotapes
DOJ had redacted 70 hours of private conversations with his ghostwriterJoe Biden has given up the fight and declined to seek further review of an appeals court ruling on the release of…
— 🇺🇸⭐️OUR-VOICES⭐️🇺🇸 (@iswho) July 25, 2026
According to public reporting, the Heritage Foundation and its Oversight Project celebrated the outcome as a “complete and total victory” over Biden’s efforts to withhold the tapes. The Justice Department now stands ready to turn over redacted transcripts and audio, which reportedly cover about 70 hours of Biden’s conversations with ghostwriter Mark Zwonitzer. These recordings were reviewed by Special Counsel Robert Hur during his probe of Biden’s classified documents handling, making them important evidence for anyone trying to understand what happened.
Why These Tapes Matter for Accountability
The recordings are more than old book interviews; they are part of the official record of how a president handled sensitive information and told his own story. House Republicans and conservative watchdogs have argued the tapes may show gaps in Biden’s memory and reveal how he discussed classified material while outside secure channels. Courts did not judge the political impact of the content, but they did recognize that the public has a strong stake in seeing materials tied to a special counsel inquiry into a president’s conduct.
This fight also highlights a larger pattern in Washington. When records touch political power, officials often try to keep them hidden and call it “privacy.” The Heritage Foundation’s win shows that, at least here, transparency laws still have teeth when citizens push hard enough. With President Trump in office, the Justice Department followed the court’s rulings instead of using executive power to shield Biden. The coming release will give Americans a rare, unfiltered look at how Biden spoke when he thought no one outside his inner circle would ever hear him.
Sources:
twitchy.com, nbcnews.com, nytimes.com, foxnews.com, youtube.com, cbsnews.com, facebook.com, politico.com, thehill.com












