Five Republican senators joined Democrats to advance a war powers resolution that would strip President Trump of his authority to conduct further military operations in Venezuela without congressional approval.
Story Highlights
- Senate advanced Venezuela war powers resolution 52-47, with five GOP defectors
- Resolution would block Trump from future Venezuela hostilities without Congress approval
- Trump angrily attacked Republican supporters, saying they “should never be elected again”
- White House promises veto if resolution reaches president’s desk
Congressional Republicans Break Ranks on Executive Overreach
The Senate’s 52-47 procedural vote exposed deepening fractures within the Republican Party over presidential war powers. Senators Rand Paul, Lisa Murkowski, Todd Young, Susan Collins, and Josh Hawley joined all Democrats to advance the measure. Their defection signals growing concern about unchecked executive authority, even among Trump’s own party. This represents a constitutional stand by lawmakers who recognize that Article I grants Congress, not the president, authority over declarations of war and sustained military commitments.
Trump’s Venezuela Operation Triggers Constitutional Crisis
Trump’s large-scale military operation that captured Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro and his wife created the immediate catalyst for congressional action. The administration framed this as a “law enforcement operation facilitated by the military” rather than an act of war, attempting to sidestep War Powers Resolution requirements. However, Trump’s declaration that America would “run” Venezuela for an indefinite period raised alarm bells about open-ended military occupation without legislative consent. This precedent threatens to normalize presidential bypass of constitutional war-making constraints.
Senator Tim Kaine, who sponsored the resolution, warned that Trump’s pattern extends beyond Venezuela to potential military actions in Iran, Gaza, Nigeria, Greenland, and the Panama Canal. The administration’s broad interpretation of executive authority could effectively render congressional war powers meaningless. Kaine argued it was “long past time for Congress to reassert its critical constitutional role in matters of war, peace, diplomacy and trade,” highlighting lawmakers’ constitutional duty to check executive overreach.
Watch:
Political Retaliation Reveals Presidential Power Grab
Trump’s furious response to Republican defectors exposed his expectation of absolute party loyalty over constitutional principles. He declared that supporting senators “should be ashamed” and “never be elected to office again,” claiming their vote “greatly hampers American self-defense and national security.” This intimidation tactic demonstrates Trump’s willingness to weaponize political pressure against lawmakers exercising their constitutional oversight responsibilities.
The White House’s veto threat, delivered through an Office of Management and Budget memo, confirms the administration’s determination to preserve unchecked military authority. Republican leadership, including Majority Whip John Barrasso, argued the resolution “weakens the President’s legitimate, constitutional authority” and would “send the wrong message to hardened drug traffickers and dictators.” However, this position prioritizes executive convenience over constitutional safeguards that prevent presidents from unilaterally committing America to foreign conflicts without public debate and legislative approval.
Sources:
Senate advances war powers resolution to rein in Trump on Venezuela
Does the War Powers Resolution apply to military actions taken in Venezuela?
Trump slams senators for advancing war powers resolution
