Would-Be Trump Assassin May Have Been Part of Conspiracy

New evidence suggests Donald Trump’s would-be assassin Thomas Matthew Crooks may have been part of a larger criminal conspiracy involving multiple collaborators and handlers.

At a Glance

  • The New York Post reports the July 13 assassination attempt on Trump may have involved a “criminal network,” not just lone gunman Thomas Matthew Crooks
  • Private investigator Doug Hagmann concluded Crooks likely had collaborators after conducting interviews and geofencing analysis
  • Crooks was described by acquaintances as happy, intelligent, and “nerdy,” raising questions about his capability to act alone
  • The Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project used mobile data to track Crooks’ connections, revealing potential links to FBI offices
  • Experts believe Crooks may have been manipulated or groomed by unknown handlers

Evidence of a Larger Conspiracy

A bombshell report from the New York Post has revived serious concerns that the attempt on President Donald Trump’s life in Butler, Pennsylvania, involved much more than a disturbed young man acting alone. Private investigator Doug Hagmann, hired to investigate the July 13 shooting, has concluded that would-be assassin Thomas Matthew Crooks likely had significant help from a larger criminal organization. Through a meticulous investigation involving witness interviews and geofencing data analysis, Hagmann discovered evidence pointing to a far more complex operation than initially reported by federal authorities.

The findings directly contradict the image of Crooks as a lone wolf shooter. Those who knew Crooks described him as happy, intelligent, and “nerdy” – hardly fitting the profile of someone capable of orchestrating such an attempt independently. Several investigative reporters and special operations experts concur that Crooks lacked the skills necessary to execute the assassination attempt without extensive preparation and external support. This disparity between Crooks’ known capabilities and the sophistication of the attack forms a cornerstone of the theory.

Expert Analysis Reveals Troubling Connections

Hagmann’s investigation uncovered evidence suggesting the operation required significant coordination and that Crooks may have been manipulated by shadowy handlers working behind the scenes.

Adding to these suspicions, the Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project utilized mobile advertising data to track Crooks’ movements and connections, revealing potential links to an FBI office in Washington, D.C. This unexpected connection has fueled speculation about potential government involvement or knowledge of the plot. The lack of a digital footprint typically associated with self-radicalization has further raised questions about who might have influenced Crooks and guided his actions leading up to that fateful day in Pennsylvania.

Perhaps most troubling are the allegations of a potential cover-up. Hagmann’s investigation suggests that certain individuals connected to the assassination attempt have not been brought to justice, with law enforcement potentially obscuring their involvement. The absence of typical planning indicators – such as online research, written manifestos, or communication with extremist groups – stands in stark contrast to patterns seen in most politically motivated attacks. This notable lack of a paper trail has only deepened suspicions among investigators.