A former Secret Service agent blasts the agency’s diversity policies, linking them to recent security failures.
At a Glance
- Rashid Ellis, a 13-year Secret Service veteran, criticizes agency’s DEI policies
- Ellis claims DEI contributed to an assassination attempt on President Trump
- The agent argues DEI has lowered morale and compromised security standards
- A documentary by the Independent Women’s Forum features Ellis’s experiences
Secret Service Agent Speaks Out Against DEI Policies
Rashid Ellis, a former Secret Service agent with 13 years of experience in elite units and top protective assignments, has publicly criticized the agency’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) policies. Ellis claims these policies contributed to a recent assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump, highlighting what he sees as a dangerous shift in the agency’s priorities.
Ellis’s concerns stem from what he perceives as a prioritization of diversity metrics over qualifications and skillsets, which he argues has resulted in the agency’s diminished protective capabilities. The veteran agent’s account of these issues is featured in a documentary by the Independent Women’s Forum titled “Qualifications, Not Quotas,” which examines the alleged negative impact of DEI policies on federal agencies.
— The Washington Stand (@WSHStand) September 30, 2024
We all knew it was true. And now we’re hearing it from the experts.
According to Ellis, the implementation of DEI policies has led to a series of troubling consequences within the Secret Service. He argues that these policies have resulted in lowered morale among agents and an exodus of experienced senior personnel. Moreover, Ellis contends that the emphasis on diversity has compromised security standards, potentially putting protectee at risk.
“My initial thoughts when seeing the Butler assassination attempt was dread. My stomach was in knots watching it because we had known for years that this was coming,” Rashid Ellis said.
Ellis cites personal experience, claiming he was unfairly denied a leadership position due to gender quotas implemented as part of DEI initiatives. This, he suggests, is indicative of a broader issue within the agency where qualifications are being overshadowed by diversity goals.
Scrutiny of Secret Service DEI Initiatives
The Secret Service’s DEI efforts have come under increased scrutiny following recent security incidents. Former Director Kimberly Cheatle’s commitment to the 30×30 initiative, aimed at increasing female representation in the agency, faced particular criticism after the Butler assassination attempt. Additionally, the agency’s Inclusion and Engagement Council and Office of Equity & Employment Support Services have been questioned for their focus on DEI initiatives during critical periods.
In response to these concerns, newly appointed Secret Service Director Sean Curran has initiated a leadership shake-up to address DEI-related issues. However, Ellis and others maintain that rectifying the perceived damage caused by these policies will take years, potentially leaving the agency’s protective mission in a weakened state for the foreseeable future.
The controversy surrounding DEI policies in the Secret Service reflects a broader national debate about the role and impact of such initiatives in federal agencies. While proponents argue that diversity strengthens organizations, critics like Ellis contend that prioritizing diversity over merit can compromise operational effectiveness, especially in high-stakes environments like protective services.
