Ethical Debate Ignites Over Controversial Sarco Capsule in Switzerland

A controversial “suicide capsule” designed for assisted death in Switzerland has become embroiled in legal scrutiny after a user’s death prompted an investigation.

At a Glance

  • Philip Nitschke, creator of the “Sarco” capsule, denies allegations of user strangulation
  • Swiss authorities are investigating the death of a 64-year-old U.S. woman who used the device
  • The incident has reignited debates on assisted suicide ethics and legality in Switzerland
  • Florian Willet, head of a Swiss affiliate of Exit International, has been in police custody for 58 days
  • Swiss law permits assisted suicide without external assistance or self-serving motives

Controversy Surrounds “Sarco” Capsule Use

The “Sarco” capsule, a device engineered by Exit International to facilitate assisted suicide, has become the center of a legal storm in Switzerland. The capsule, which administers nitrogen gas to induce a peaceful death, was used by a 64-year-old American woman with a compromised immune system on September 23 in a northern Swiss forest. The incident has sparked an investigation and raised questions about the ethics and legality of assisted suicide in the country.

Philip Nitschke, the creator of the Sarco capsule and a prominent right-to-die activist, vehemently denies allegations that the woman was strangled during the process. Nitschke, who observed the event via live video, insists that the capsule functioned as intended. However, Swiss prosecutors have suggested the possibility of strangulation, leading to a complex legal situation.

Legal Implications and Arrests

The incident has resulted in several arrests, including that of Florian Willet, head of The Last Resort, a Swiss affiliate of Exit International. Willet has been in police custody for approximately 58 days, prompting concern from Nitschke. Initially, others present at the scene, including a journalist, were detained on suspicion of incitement and accessory to suicide but were later released.

“We’ve got to try and do something about the fact that Florian has been stuck in prison now for about 58 days,” Philip Nitschke said.

Nitschke has offered to provide video footage and data to Swiss prosecutors to support his claim that the capsule was not opened after the woman’s death, contradicting the strangulation theory. “We will provide everything we’ve got,” Nitschke stated, emphasizing his willingness to cooperate with the investigation.

Swiss Law and Assisted Suicide

Swiss law permits assisted suicide under specific conditions, requiring that it be carried out without external assistance or self-serving motives. The Sarco capsule, which cost $1 million to develop, was designed to allow users to self-administer nitrogen gas, leading to unconsciousness and death. This case has reignited debates on the balance between individual rights and societal implications of assisted death.

“It is absurd because we’ve got film that the capsule wasn’t opened,” Philip Nitschke said.

As the investigation continues, Swiss police have confiscated the only operational Sarco device. Nitschke awaits a legal decision before considering further use of the capsule in Switzerland. The controversy surrounding the Sarco capsule underscores the ongoing ethical and legal challenges in the realm of assisted suicide, even in countries with permissive laws like Switzerland.