EPA DELAYS – Health At Risk? 

The EPA’s delay in enforcing PFAS regulations until 2031 provides financial relief to water utilities but raises questions about long-term public health impacts from these “forever chemicals.”

At a Glance

  • EPA is extending the compliance deadline for PFOA and PFOS regulations from 2029 to 2031
  • The agency is reconsidering limits for four additional PFAS chemicals, potentially rescinding some requirements
  • An estimated 100 million Americans are affected by excess PFAS levels in drinking water
  • Municipalities may delay planned water bill rate hikes that would fund new filtration systems
  • Health advocates worry about prolonged exposure to chemicals linked to cancer and liver damage

EPA Delays PFAS Regulation Timeline

The Environmental Protection Agency has announced significant changes to its approach on regulating PFAS in America’s drinking water. The compliance deadline for reducing two major “forever chemicals” – PFOA and PFOS – is now proposed to extend from 2029 to 2031. Additionally, the EPA is reconsidering limits for four other PFAS compounds: PFHxS, PFNA, HFPO-DA, and PFBS, with plans to rescind some requirements established under the Biden administration.

PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are synthetic chemicals used in numerous consumer products including waterproof clothing, non-stick cookware, and firefighting foams. Their strong chemical bonds prevent them from breaking down naturally in the environment or human body, earning them the “forever chemicals” designation. The EPA estimates that between 6-10% of public water systems have excess PFAS levels, affecting approximately 100 million Americans.

 

Economic Relief vs. Health Concerns

The regulatory delay provides financial breathing room for water utilities facing immediate infrastructure upgrade costs. Compliance with the original PFAS standards was estimated at $1.5 billion annually nationwide, costs that would have been passed to consumers through rate increases. Many municipalities had already proposed or implemented water bill hikes to fund new filtration systems – increases that might now be delayed or reconsidered.

“It is possible that some rate hikes will be delayed as water systems will have more time to comply with the revised rule. The additional time will also allow new treatment technologies to come online, which are likely to be more affordable and effective.”, said Vern Steel

The Association of State Drinking Water Administrators has expressed support for the extended timeline, citing significant challenges water utilities would face in meeting the original 2029 deadline. However, environmental and health advocates view the delay with skepticism, arguing it prioritizes cost savings over public health protection. Long-term exposure to PFAS has been linked to serious health issues including cancer, liver damage, decreased fertility, and increased risk of asthma and thyroid disease.

Different State Responses

Despite the federal changes, some states and municipalities are proceeding with their own PFAS reduction plans. Broward County, Florida, has indicated it will continue with significant investments in nanofiltration systems regardless of the extended federal timeline. California is working to maintain or even strengthen PFAS limits despite potential federal rollbacks.

“Californians shouldn’t have to worry that their drinking water has been contaminated by toxic forever chemicals that are linked to deadly cancers and other serious health harms. Unfortunately, we have seen recently efforts by corporate polluters to challenge the federal standards. They’re trying to weaken and roll back these protections that are so essential for our communities.”, Jesse Gabriel, said

EPA Defends Changes

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin has defended the changes, emphasizing that the agency’s commitment to protecting Americans from PFAS continues. He suggested that the final limits might ultimately be stricter, not weaker, after the review process is completed. The EPA plans to issue a new proposed rule in fall 2025, with finalization targeted for spring 2026.

“The work to protect Americans from PFAS in drinking water started under the first Trump Administration and will continue under my leadership.”, said EPA administrator Lee Zeldin

Some observers point out that the Safe Drinking Water Act contains an “anti-backsliding provision” that prevents weakening of established rules. However, critics argue that while the final standards may not be weakened, the extended timeline itself constitutes a significant setback for public health protections. The EPA is planning a comprehensive PFAS outreach campaign to educate communities and water systems about the risks and remediation options during this extended compliance period.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR